Showing posts with label LIVING WITH CANCER. Show all posts
Showing posts with label LIVING WITH CANCER. Show all posts

Friday, February 17, 2017

Photo
Titian’s “Sisyphus,” from the collection of Museo del Prado, Madrid.CreditFine Art Images/Heritage Images, via Getty Images
For most people with cancer, life has conventional stages that I can sum up with acronyms: B.C. (before cancer), A.D. (at diagnosis), S.S.N. (some surgical nightmare), RATS (radiation therapies), ICH (in chemotherapy), followed by IRS (in a remission of some number).
Like a growing number of patients today, I inhabit a less familiar state: maintenance. This new phase presents a viable alternative to remission which, I sometimes feel, is not everything it is cracked up to be.
Why does cancer’s version of “IRS” spawn fears that can rival those spiked by a letter from the other I.R.S.? The short answer: remission is challenging. It comes with fear of recurrence. It’s impossible not to worry: Will it last? Throughout three cycles of chemotherapy for ovarian cancer, I longed for the moment when the infusion of toxins would cease, only to discover that all sorts of physical and psychological aftereffects dampened my spirits during remission.
First, consider the all-consuming issues of hair and weight. “It’s just hair and it will grow back” is a theme song many of us hum in treatment. But if it grows back curly when it had been straight or white when it had been brown or thin when it had been thick, it can be distressing to look in the mirror. Also, it does not always grow back, as I can unfortunately attest. Similarly, the weight lost or gained (yes, it can be gained) during chemo may continue falling or rising after its cessation.
Continue reading the main story
Even when the women in my support group managed to look nearly normal at the start of a remission, their families’ belief that they were as good as new bred dismay. Dana and Traci’s teenagers wanted them to host social events and go hiking. Kids relieved that they no longer have to parent their parents may feel they have earned the right to think, “Hey, we didn’t have any fun during treatment so it should be party time now.” But fatigue, muscle loss and neuropathies, not to mention the insecurity they spawn, make such expectations daunting.
After I told Dana and Traci’s stories to my husband, he said, “You have the advantage of being married to an older man: joint decrepitude.”
Before cancer I would cook for a dinner party of eight planned for the same evening. During chemo, I could not stomach the meals that friends provided. In remission it took a week of planning and concocting foods that could be reheated or else I would keel over while proposing a toast. Before cancer, I could walk a few miles. During treatment, I lay on a blue couch. In remission, I forced myself to bring in the mail. Whereas during chemo I had a good excuse for not changing the sheets every Sunday, in remission I judged myself an incorrigible sluggard.
Then there is the real kicker of being an ingrate. Surely remission should be the promised end. So why did I experience it as another version of the horrors of treatment?
Oddly, then, it comes as some relief to inhabit a state outside the normative categories. I am now neither in chemotherapy nor in remission because I am being treated with an experimental, targeted drug. While the cancer can be controlled with daily pills, I am “on maintenance”: Stable until the medication fails to work. Whereas in remission I worried about not being regularly checked by my oncologist, on maintenance I know that I will be monitored.
It is hard for many acquaintances to grasp my situation. People often congratulate me on being “cancer-free.” The comment puts me in a funk. But who wants to be a pedantic downer insisting that her disease requires constant treatment or it would come roaring back? Such a bad attitude would make me vulnerable to the all-too-common view that pessimism breeds disease and that I deserve the cancer I dread.
Thinking logically, I know that it is far better to be in a remission than on maintenance. After all, a lengthening remission may signify a cure. Nancy K. Miller, a writer and friend dealing with lung cancer, says, “The problem with maintenance is it has no plot.” But I’m not sure I agree. The plot of remission — will it last? — seems more anxiety-producing than the plot of maintenance: how long will it last?
I often feel relief at not being burdened by hope of a cure — as if Sisyphus got a chance to admire the view from the mountain after someone else erected a temporary barrier to stop the boulder from rolling down. It probably will eventually roll down, flattening me. But did I mention the view?
Assuming that the cancer will return means one less thing to worry about, weird as that might sound. Once cure has been crossed off my list of priorities, other goals spring up: visiting with family and friends as much as possible; making loud noises on any and all occasions about the need for better detection and prevention; standing up to look at the longer vista as a grateful representative of what contemporary science can do.
Having lived with incurable but not terminal cancer for some years, I try not to torture myself with suspense. Why waste the precious time granted? On good days, feeling meditative, I conceptualize being on maintenance as inhabiting the incantatory zone of “OM.”
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/16/well/live/in-maintenance-mode-living-in-the-moment.html?emc=edit_tnt_20170217&nlid=52389906&tntemail0=y&_r=0

Saturday, September 12, 2015

Living with cancer blog

You aren't your cancer diagnosis

By Sheryl M. Ness, R.N. September 3, 2015
Having a diagnosis of cancer can take over your life. This is especially true during the intense period of initial diagnosis, treatment and immediate recovery.
All of a sudden, you become defined by your diagnosis. Your life is filled with doctor's appointments, tests, scans, treatment and check-ups. You may no longer be working, and roles may have shifted at home as well as with friends.
It's easy to lose yourself during this time. However, you aren't defined by your cancer. What makes you you? Find ways to reconnect with your many life accomplishments during this time.
Never lose sight of the gifts that you have. Perhaps it is your ability to make others laugh, or your love of adventure, music, art, reading or photography.
As you consider what makes you happy, try to think of creative ways to keep the strong connection to doing what you love. Here are a few ideas:
  • Make a short list of what defined you before you were diagnosed with cancer (mother, father, friend, runner, engineer, traveler, artist, musician, etc.)
  • Go through the list and make notes next to the things that are the most important to you at the moment.
  • Create a new list to keep the things that you love in your life during this time.
  • Add anything new that you'd like to accomplish, including steps on how you think you might accomplish your goals.
When we teach our Moving Forward after Cancer Treatment class, we try to encourage participants to write down a few ideas to bring back the things that are meaningful to them.
This idea also gives you permission to not think of yourself as your cancer diagnosis, but who you are as a person. It's so wonderful to see the person light up as they talk about what's important to them.
This week, consider what defines you as a person. How have you reconnected with yourself during and after treatment? Try the ideas above and share your experience with others on the blog.

Friday, January 23, 2015

Living With Cancer: Coming to Terms

Photo
CreditKeith Negley
Living With Cancer
LIVING WITH CANCER
Susan Gubar writes about life with ovarian cancer.
While I continue taking an experimental drug to keep my cancer at bay, I cannot claim to be in either a remission or a recurrence, and the word “maintenance” does not shed much light on the situation. The paucity of the language at my disposal stymies me, as does its obfuscations. I am grateful that patients , hungry for more fortifying formulations, have begun to create them.
“Language is the mother of thought, not the handmaiden of thought,” the poet W. H. Auden once said, quoting the aphorist Karl Kraus, and then he added, “Words will tell you things you never thought or felt before.” Some of the vocabulary swirling around cancer leaves me feeling what I never wanted to feel or unable to think what I need to think.
Consider, first, medical lexicons that appear to blame the people receiving care. A patient said to have “failed tamoxifen” knows the drug has failed her. Similarly, a “platinum resistant” or “refractory” patient experiences not her refractory resistance but a drug’s ineffectuality. The word “relapsed” seems to find fault with people who have fallen back into error. Preferring the term but dreading the fact of recurrence, I bristle at surgical scans said to be “clean,” for the word makes me feel that I have been or will become dirty.
In the topsy-turvy world of cancer, anything “positive” or “advancing” spells trouble. Yet a brain labeled “unremarkable” after an M.R.I. hardly conveys the good news it contains.
Cancer’s most prominent words simply sound horrible to my ear: the mal at the start of malignancy and the hiss at the end of metastasis, as well as the hard-to-pronounce cachexia (loss of body mass) and ascites (buildup of fluids), not to mention such drugs as bevacizumab (Avastin), capecitabine (Xeloda), pemetrexed (Alimta) and trastuzumab (Herceptin). Doesn’t it seem sinister (and confusing) that each has an a.k.a.?
Just as jarring is the use of fine words in grotesque settings: cancer has “seeded” itself throughout the body; nodes have been “harvested”; a tumor is “indolent.”
Euphemisms for tumors abound. I have often been told that scans showed a lesion, shadow or spots. Before a number of medical regimens, I was informed about “minimal or acceptable side effects,” only later to wonder if I should have undergone treatments that left me with sores and rashes so debilitating that I could not swallow or with bone-wearying exhaustion that made it impossible to stand up. Because hospital idioms mask brutal realities, Dr. Susan Love came up with the now ubiquitous phrase “slash, burn and poison.”
Created by patients, portmanteaus — two words combined to produce a third — capture the dread of cancer as well as efforts to cover it up. My favorite, “scanxiety,” designates fears accompanying the anticipation of a test that may show evidence of disease. “Chemoflage,” as used by the anthropologist S. Lochlann Jain, mocks the deceptive information circulated by cheery chemotherapy brochures.
After genetic testing produced a population of people aware of their heightened risk of developing cancer, the neologism “previvor” arose to describe those who have tested “positive” for a deleterious mutation. It refers to survivors of a predisposition to cancer and has largely replaced the medical category — “unaffected carriers” — that turned this group into a contaminating menace.
Certain phenomena commonly confronted by cancer patients await new words. What should we call the befuddlement that results from the conflicting opinions of specialists on the course of action urged on a patient? Or the mind-numbing misery of interminable waits in (usually beige) waiting rooms (with jigsaw puzzles)? Don’t we need a rubric for the growing population that must turn down the unpronounceable drugs because they are unaffordable?
For years I have resisted the pervasive tag “cancer survivor” because it erases or demeans patients who do not or suspect they cannot survive the disease. In its place, readers have suggested P.L.C. (Person Living with Cancer), cancer veteran, cancer gambler and, given all the hospital trips, cancer schlepper (for which I thank my friend Nancy K. Miller).
Recently, my oncologist called me “an exceptional responder.” Since most of the people in my clinical trial have suffered recurrences, Dr. Matei meant to be happy on my behalf, but the classification saddened me on theirs.
So I was delighted to encounter an essay by another friend who encourages linguistic exuberance with respect to this matter of self-definition. In an article composed nine years before her death from metastatic breast cancer, the witty queer theorist Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick recommended acronyms like BBP (Bald Barfing Person) and WAPHMO (Woman About to go Postal at H.M.O.). She then confided that she personally had alternated between PSHIFTY (Person Still Hanging In Fine Thank You) and QIBIFA (Quite Ill, But Inexplicably Fat Anyway) until she settled on “undead.”
To describe herself when she would no longer qualify to be numbered among the undead, Eve decided on “differently extant.” Like many of our cherished deceased, she remains to this day palpably and differently extant. Her words help me come to terms.
http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2015/01/22/living-with-cancer-coming-to-terms/?emc=edit_tnt_20150123&nlid=52389906&tntemail0=y&_r=0

Thursday, March 6, 2014

Living With Cancer: Finding Calm in the Storm

Ascent Xmedia/Getty Images
Living With Cancer
LIVING WITH CANCER
Susan Gubar writes about life with ovarian cancer.
http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/03/06/living-with-cancer-finding-calm-in-the-storm/?_php=true&_type=blogs&_php=true&_type=blogs&emc=edit_tnt_20140306&nlid=2996504&tntemail0=y&_r=1&

Every Sunday evening, I phone a friend in another college town who has not yet found a cancer support group in her community. Let’s call her Melanie. Melanie had recovered from surgery and completed chemotherapy. Physically, she had gained strength. Yet she continued to feel overwhelmed by negative thoughts.
“Is it possible to escape the terrifying sandstorms of fear and anxiety?” she asked after we discussed the inefficacy of her antidepressant. Probably not, I thought, but surely we can find oases of respite and reprieve.
Melanie had been reading “Women Who Think Too Much,” a title that initially put me off. Like “Women Who Worry Too Much” and “Women Who Love Too Much,” it seemed to blame women for being (you guessed it, we’ve heard it before) “too much.” But the book, by Susan Nolen-Hoeksema, offered my friend a number of pragmatic ways to distract herself from recurrent worries and keep stressful “overthinking” from spiraling out of control.
For men as well as women, cancer and its treatments often set off torrents of self-criticism, ruminations about what went wrong, recriminations aimed at others, obsessive dread of making medical decisions and of incapacities in a tattered present and a fraught future. Feelings of worthlessness, or worse, of being a damaged and damaging burden, breed depression. From Professor Nolen-Hoeksema, my friend had learned some useful strategies to help her interrupt the injurious scenarios repeating in her head.
Of course I was positive about efforts to stymie negativity, even though I am sometimes wary of the feel-good-in-a-minute guarantees of alternative approaches. So I affirmed all of Melanie’s efforts and started considering my own alternatives to alternative approaches — which I offer here not to supplant but to supplement the breathing, meditation, visualization, massage and exercise routines in many self-help books. While cancer proves that we cannot control our bodies, my support group continually reminds me, we can try to guide our minds and spirits.
1. Plan and make a dinner for three vegans. You will be thinking about, buying ingredients for and preparing labor-intensive foods like sweet potatoes topped with black bean chili, avocado pesto on pasta, mushroom barley soup, aloo gobi, falafel or spicy tomato lentil stew.
2. Arrange a play date with your favorite child for a marathon board game or series of card games or a session of seed-planting or painting.
3. Because of the web, retail therapy works even if you cannot go out to shop, but I prefer Scrabble via Facebook with far- flung relatives.
4. Lie down on top of your beloved or have your beloved lie down on top of you, or lie next to each other. This one came from Melanie, and I know it works. I will only add that it can also, of course, be done with a pet.
5. Have a glass of cabernet, a jigger of single-malt Scotch, or a hot toddy at 5 p.m. There is a reason drink time comes at the close of the day, when waning light causes us to brood over nightfall. Or start the other great opiate: a novel.
6. A long television series like “Friday Night Lights” can do wonders, though the writers of “Breaking Bad” may have fallen back on the dubious metaphor of cancer as a corrosive social canker: not only is the central character motivated to make meth to pay for treatment but cancer also represents the malignancy that has turned Walt Whitman’s America into the violent society inhabited by Walt White.
7. Nothing is more addictive than the sort of repetitive behavior associated with knitting, sewing, woodworking, purging closets, practicing a musical instrument, or even (for some) ironing.
8. Consider a mantra: “I am safe right now.” (This one came from Melanie.) Or “Don’t leave before you leave.” (This one is recycled from Sheryl Sandberg’s “Lean In” by a member of my support group.) Or if you are more vindictive: “Screw cancer.”
9. Sign up with a volunteer organization that helps feed the hungry or provides medical help to the indigent or supports at-risk schoolchildren or offers shelter to the homeless.
10. Lie down by yourself or with a partner or a pet (maybe with that glass of cabernet or Scotch) and listen to the late Beethoven quartets or Billie Holiday or the Beatles.
There are surely other ways to come to terms with these storms, which are, after all, part of the human condition. For me that week, a Sunday night phone conversation with Melanie served as an oasis.
To you, my darling friend who knows yourself to be Melanie: now that you are facing a recurrence and grimmer odds, I beg in this embarrassingly public forum what I entreat privately. Please find a way to tarry among us. May my lame list exasperate you sufficiently to come up with more havens. And let’s talk again . . . and then again.
http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/03/06/living-with-cancer-finding-calm-in-the-storm/?_php=true&_type=blogs&_php=true&_type=blogs&emc=edit_tnt_20140306&nlid=2996504&tntemail0=y&_r=1&

Friday, November 29, 2013

Living With Cancer: Giving Thanks and Latkes

Andrew Scrivani for The New York Times
  • FACEBOOK
  • TWITTER
  • GOOGLE+
  • SAVE
  • EMAIL
  • SHARE
  • PRINT
Living With Cancer
LIVING WITH CANCER
Susan Gubar writes about life with ovarian cancer.
When I consider how this Hanukkah will be different from all other Hanukkahs, I wonder if my giddiness can be attributed to cancer and the treatments that have governed my life for the past five years.
Some time ago, an email I received from a reader explained that this year Thanksgiving and the first day of Hanukkah will fall on the same date. A 9-year-old, Asher Weintraub, has come up with the idea of a menorah in the shape of a turkey, “a menurkey.” Never before and never again will the two holidays coincide in most of our lifetimes.
While I reside in a state of anticipatory glee at the visit of my girls and their boys, I loathe the idea of ascribing my pleasure to a horrible disease. How, then, can I make sense of the fact that cancer has apparently given me a number of gifts and opportunities for growth — including a deepening capacity for joy?
Every two weeks, as I leave the hospital with another brown bag of experimental drugs, I consider the nurses and doctors who have performed what seems like a miracle to me. This year, 2013, was supposed to be the year of my death. When diagnosed in 2008, I was informed that I had three to five years left. Because of a clinical trial, I am living on borrowed time, which is experienced as a daily marvel. I realize, of course, that the trial extending my life will not cure me, that recurrence will probably be inevitable, along with palliative end-of-life care. Yet it is precisely this realization that intensifies my gratitude for being able to attend family gatherings at momentous events like a wedding, a birthday or a holiday during a succession of pain-free months.
Without cancer, I would never have encountered the six women in my support group. Nor would we have learned each other’s histories or cultivated the arts of empathy. We do not seek to give what we would want but what we think the person in need wants at any particular stage of treatment.
I have been kept alive by my family, the clinical trial, the support group, and by Tara Parker-Pope, who encouraged me to embark on the Living With Cancer series of essays at just the moment I was accepted into the clinical trial. Lest you judge me daft for ranking a blog among my life-support systems, let me explain that writing these columns and reading your comments — which would never have happened without cancer and without the models provided by the other New York Times writers Dana Jennings and Suleika Jaouad — have buoyed me up and cast me down and kept me thoroughly absorbed every day this year, engaged in what feels like a virtual community.
How can I refuse to grant cancer a positive role in my life, given these substantial rewards? Obstinate, I can and do.
For it is not cancer but rather a heightened sense of impending mortality that bestows these gifts, along with an appreciation of ongoing life never before lived, never again to be lived. Such awareness of embracing the impermanence and unpredictability of life and of those in our lives also sparks the urgency of testimony.
A famous line of poetry by Wallace Stevens — “Death is the mother of beauty”— comes into focus in a new way. Only when we realize not that the other guy is going to die but that I am going to die do we see the beauty of transient existence and the beauty of trying to engage with its every facet, even the most fraught. The exaltation, the sheer pleasure of having been alive, of being alive, catches in the throat, brims tears in the eyes, for which we can only be glad. As for those cherished: no words are commensurate, just a delicate treasuring.
Like a one-of-a-kind existence, a one-of-a-kind holiday makes me think that the question always asked at the Passover Seder — “Why is this night different from all other nights?”– should be asked not only on Thanksgiving Hanukkah but on every night.
Never before and never again will I write such a happy essay, I suspect. To celebrate before I return to my usual muddles, I want to rejoice over the potato: a stolid epitome of ephemerality, since it discolors so quickly after being skinned.

Susan Gubar’s Potato Latkes
My holiday latkes are distinguished from traditional versions in only three modest ways. First, half of the potatoes are finely chopped, half more roughly grated. Second, the pancakes are finished in the oven so the exhausted cook can rest before enjoying them with guests. Third, the toppings are a tad zany. This recipe to serve four can be easily multiplied for more since it uses a food processor.
3 baking potatoes
1 onion
2 eggs
3 tablespoons matzo meal or flour
2 teaspoons kosher salt
Pepper
Vegetable oil for frying
1. Preheat oven to 250 degrees. Skin the potatoes and onion and cut into chunks. Using the chopping blade of a food processor, pulse half the potatoes and the onion until finely minced. Using the grater blade, grate the other half of the potatoes. Squeeze as much liquid as possible out of this mixture by pushing it against a strainer or wringing it in cheesecloth. In a large bowl, mix the potatoes and onions with the other ingredients.
2. In a heavy skillet, heat about one quarter of an inch of oil until a fleck of onion sizzles.  Put in two tablespoons of the mixture and flatten into a three inch round.  Fry four or five pancakes at a time, flipping when golden brown—about five minutes on each side.  Lay them on a paper towel and then on a cookie sheet while you do the next batch. The potato pancakes can stay in the oven for an hour.
3. A standard topping like applesauce or sour cream can be supplemented with bowls of chutney, salsa, olive salad, caviar or (yes!) cranberry relish.
Yield: 4 servings

Friday, September 27, 2013

Living With Cancer: Feeling Older Than My Age

Liam Norris/Getty Images
  • FACEBOOK
  • TWITTER
  • GOOGLE+
  • SAVE
  • E-MAIL
  • SHARE
  • PRINT
Sometimes cancer and its treatments make me feel as if I have entered a time machine that accelerates aging.
Several months ago I met a friend for a cup of tea and as we were paying, I caught sight of a stooped old lady across from me: no eyebrows on a pale face framed by thinning hair. A heartbeat later, the mirror image administered a shock. This crone belies my psychic age; that is, the age matching what I feel to be my authentic core identity. The little old lady looked about 85, whereas my psychic age hovers at a somewhat rebellious 16. My companion in the cafe, who copes with lung cancer, counseled me: “Important never to look in the mirror.”
Don’t get me wrong. I have always admired the spunky old ladies who teeter along upper Broadway with the aid of a companion or a walker. But they had a chance, I hope, to ease into their decrepitude gradually, whereas I seem to have jolted into mine in the prime of life. After three abdominal surgeries and three cycles of chemotherapy, a deeply cut gulf separates my little old lady self from the active 63-year-old before diagnosis.
Regardless of chronology, people in cancer treatment, even children, often look like we evolved from an antique race descended from Yoda: balding, shrunken, slow moving, greenish.
My little old lady self cannot bounce out of bed to start the day. Pills have to be doled out first. Instead of quickly throwing on appropriate clothes for the tasks at hand, my little old lady self places a comfortable uniform down on the bed — underwear, leggings, T-shirt, sweater, socks and thick-soled shoes — so she can sit down between the exertion of putting on each garment. The tasks at hand narrow to maintenance — grocery shopping, cooking, bills — instead of the teaching and mentoring and traveling of the past.
Before cancer, I felt the way Oliver Wendell Holmes did: “Old age is 15 years older than I am.”
Now, though, a humbling acknowledgment permeates the atmosphere of little-old-lady-land: a realization that I cannot do what I used to do, a sense of being feeble or vulnerable, physically as well as mentally.
I must sit by the stove, waiting to turn off a boiling pot, or else I will forget and its contents will burn away along with the house. My computer passwords have to be reset repeatedly. Someone needs to drive me since my toes cramp up, making walking or accelerating and breaking perilous.
At various times, I have needed pharmaceutical products that arrived in large boxes. Bandages, bags, adhesives, latex gloves, syringes, surgical tape, gauze pads, antibiotics, salves, mouthwashes, drops, wipes and painkillers pile up in my closet so guests will not see them in the bathroom.
What an alter cocker — the Yiddish phrase for an old, complaining person — I have become.
“There is a difference between getting old and feeling old,” my 17-years-older (non-Yiddish speaking) husband staunchly asserts. Desire stands him in good stead.
“Getting old means knowing you can’t stay up late at a party or run a mile,” he says. “Feeling old means you don’t want to stay up late at a party or run a mile. We’re not in an assisted care unit yet,” he smiles, “or visited weekly by home health care nurses!”
“You got old before you felt old,” I respond, hugging him. “I felt old before I got old.”
Wanting to do what he can’t do oddly cheers him. But as the time machine curiously slows me down while it accelerates my aging, I try to savor doing what I didn’t do when I was an ambitious middle-aged professional.
These days I can sit still and listen—not advise or judge but listen — to my daughters and step-daughters. I’m grateful for the opportunity my grandchildren give me to hang out: a different pleasure with the 13-year-old (we play electronic games), the 7-year-old (he reads aloud to me) and the baby (who grins and gurgles while I hug and sing).
There is another silver lining, even for a psychic adolescent. As I become my husband’s contemporary, we remain soul mates, even though (or maybe because) his psychic age is 11. So occasionally I still get to boss him around.
Or is that notion just one of my teen dreams?